Connect with us

News

Senate Approves Tinubu’s State of Emergency Rule In Rivers State

Published

on

Senate in Session
Senate in Session
Share

The Senate, at its plenary on Thursday, approved President Tinubu’s State of Emergency Proclamation in Rivers State.

Earlier, the red chamber moved into closed session to consider the President’s request.

However, knowing that it would be a Herculean task to secure the required 2/3 of the Senate to approve the request, the Senate went into close session and adopted the voice vote which is subject to manipulation by the presiding officer, the Senate President.

When the Senate plenary commenced on Thursday, Senate President Godswill Akpabio read the official communication from President Tinubu to formally inform the Senate of his decision.

In the letter on the 2025 State of Emergency in Rivers State, Tinubu said

“In compliance with the provisions of Section 305(2) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), I hereby forward, for the consideration of the Senate, copies of the official gazettes of the 2025 State of Emergency Proclamation.

“The main features of the proclamation are as follows: A declaration of a state of emergency in one state of the federation, namely, Rivers State.

“The suspension from office of the Governor, Deputy Governor, and all members of the State House of Assembly.

The appointment of a retired Vice Admiral as Administrator to oversee the state, subject to any instructions or regulations issued by me.

“While I look forward to the Senate’s expeditious consideration of this matter, please accept, Mr. Senate President, the assurances of my highest consideration.

Yours sincerely, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, President, Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria”.

Akpabio quickly committed the letter to the “Committee of the Whole Senate for immediate consideration”.

Immediately after this, the Senate Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele moved a motion to reorder the items on the Order Paper of the day to consider the state of emergency proclamation first.

He said “Mr. President, in accordance with Order 1(b) of our rules, I move that we reorder the agenda on the Order Paper to enable us to take the first order of the day, which is my motion pursuant to the proclamation of a state of emergency in Rivers State. Mr. President has just read the correspondence from the President regarding this proclamation. I so move.”

The Senate Minority Leader, Abba Moro in seconding the motion said, “Mr. President, distinguished colleagues, I second the motion moved by the Senate Leader that the Senate reorders its Order Paper for today to take the first order of the day. I so second”.

The Senate President said “Distinguished colleagues, the motion has been moved and seconded that we reorder the items on our Order Paper. Those in support, say ‘Aye.’ Those against, say ‘Nay.’ The Ayes have it”.

Senator Henry Seriake Dickson (Bayelsa West) who rose on a point of order drew attention to the specific provisions of Senate rules, saying “as senators, we are guided by two key documents: the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Senate Standing Orders.

“Specifically, Order 135 of our rules outlines the procedure for handling a state of emergency proclamation. It states that when the President issues such a proclamation, he shall, in a closed session, brief the Senate on the circumstances leading to the decision.

See also FG Inaugurates 10-Man Inter-Ministerial Committee to enforce Supreme Court judgement on local governments autonomy

“In light of this, Mr. President, I respectfully request that we adhere to Order 135 and move into a closed session for this briefing.”

Senate President noted his point of order and duly upheld it and therefore said “Senate will now proceed to a closed session as required by Order 135”.

However, when it was clear that the House of Representatives has already approved the state of emergency proclamation by President Bola Tinubu, it was just a matter of time that the Senate would most likely toe the same line after the close session, which was what happened.

 

 

 

 

News

Senate Moves to Reshape Legal Profession, Proposes Two-Year Mandatory Pupillage for New Lawyers

Published

on

Senate Logo
Share

The Nigerian Senate on Wednesday considered sweeping reforms to the legal profession, passing into second reading a bill seeking to amend the Legal Practitioners Act 2004. Central to the proposal is a mandatory two-year pupillage programme for newly called lawyers, designed to align training and regulation with global best practices.

Debating the bill at plenary, lawmakers agreed that the legal system must evolve in response to technological advancement, complex commercial transactions, and growing demands for professional accountability. The bill was sponsored and led by the Leader of the Senate, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele.

According to Bamidele, the current law — nearly six decades old in design — no longer reflects contemporary realities of legal practice. He explained that the reform seeks to modernise oversight structures, strengthen discipline mechanisms, and enhance the quality of service within the profession.

A major highlight of the bill is the restructuring of the Body of Benchers, which, for the first time, will be established as a corporate legal entity with financial autonomy, strengthened secretariat, and defined rule-making authority. The reforms also introduce a clearer institutional framework for committees, oversight, and policy enforcement.

The Senate Leader stressed that the initiative would deliver “a coordinated and well-modernised regulatory framework that addresses admission to the bar, discipline, and professional standards.”

The bill also seeks to fast-track disciplinary processes by reorganising the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC). Under the proposed structure, multiple panels would sit across the country while wielding broader sanctioning powers, including suspension, disbarment, restitution, compensation, cost awards, and formal apologies. For transparency, disciplinary outcomes will be published, while affected practitioners will retain the right of appeal to the Supreme Court.

Additionally, the proposal creates a new Ethics, Adherence and Enforcement Committee empowered to inspect law offices, demand records, investigate public complaints, and prosecute cases before the LPDC.

To further boost competence, two years of compulsory pupillage and ongoing professional development will now be requirements for lawyers before full practice certification and licence renewal.

The bill also criminalises unauthorised legal practice, clearly defining the practice of law to protect the public from impersonators and unqualified service providers. Other provisions address the regulation of foreign lawyers, reform of the Senior Advocate of Nigeria rank, and improved safeguards for clients and public trust.

Speaking in support, Chief Whip of the Senate, Senator Tahir Monguno, recalled his experience entering practice over 35 years ago, noting that the realities of the digital age justify reform.

“This bill is very apt and germane,” Monguno said. “We are in the digital age, and our legal profession must reflect these realities.”

The Senate subsequently referred the bill to its Committee on Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters for public hearing and a report within two weeks.

 

Continue Reading

News

Tinubu Approves Nigerian Team for US–Nigeria Joint Security Working Group

Published

on

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu
Share

President Bola Tinubu has approved the Nigerian contingent of the US–Nigeria Joint Working Group, a new collaborative platform aimed at strengthening security cooperation between both countries.

The decision follows agreements reached during a recent high-level visit to Washington, D.C., led by the National Security Adviser (NSA), Nuhu Ribadu. Ribadu will head the Nigerian side of the Working Group, supported by senior officials drawn from key security and government institutions.

The Nigerian members include Minister of Foreign Affairs, Amb. Yusuf Maitama Tuggar; Minister of Defence, Mohammed Badaru Abubakar; Minister of Interior, Hon. Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo; and the Minister of Humanitarian Affairs, Dr. Bernard M. Doro.

Also on the team are the Chief of Defence Staff, Gen. Olufemi Oluyede; Director-General of the National Intelligence Agency, Amb. Mohammed Mohammed; and the Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun.

Ms. Idayat Hassan of the Office of the National Security Adviser and Mr. Paul Alabi of the Nigerian Embassy in the United States will serve as the secretariat.

President Tinubu urged the members to work closely with their US counterparts to ensure the effective implementation of all agreements reached across various sectors.

The announcement was made on Wednesday in a statement by Bayo Onanuga, Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy.

Continue Reading

News

Obasanjo Returns $20,000 Allegedly Given for Fayose’s Birthday Logistics

Published

on

EX President Olusegun Obasanjo and Former Ekiti State, Ayo Fayose
Share

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has returned the $20,000 allegedly provided to him by former Ekiti State Governor, Ayo Fayose, ahead of Fayose’s 65th birthday celebration, following a fresh disagreement between the two political figures.

Fayose confirmed the development during an interview with AF24 News, where he narrated the sequence of events surrounding the controversy. According to him, preparations for his birthday prompted him to reach out to individuals he had previously fallen out with politically. He noted that this move was aimed at “mending fences,” but stressed that his call to Obasanjo should not be misconstrued as an apology.

The former governor recounted that Obasanjo visited his Lagos residence days before the celebration and expressed willingness to attend the event, despite having a conflicting engagement in Rwanda. Fayose said that during the visit, Obasanjo requested financial support for his travel logistics, prompting him to provide $20,000.

“I changed $20,000 and gave it to him. How can you accept somebody’s money and come and be spiting that person?” Fayose said, expressing disappointment over Obasanjo’s subsequent public remarks.

The matter escalated after Obasanjo stated that he had not opened the money and would return it, comments that Fayose considered disrespectful. In response, Fayose said he sent the former president a strongly worded text message demanding clarity and expressing his displeasure.

Following the exchange, Obasanjo reportedly returned the money.

“I have written to him, and he has returned my $20,000,” Fayose confirmed during the interview. When asked how he felt about the return of the funds, he replied: “I am very happy. I will not allow such a man to carry my money away.”

The clash adds another layer to the long-standing political tension between both men, who have had a history of public disagreements spanning several years.

Continue Reading