Two Nigerian lawyers, Inibehe Effiong and Bodunde Opeyemi, have attributed the ongoing leadership crisis in the African Democratic Congress (ADC) to procedural decisions and binding court rulings, rather than external political interference.
Their analysis comes amid public speculation linking the crisis to the influence of Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the All Progressives Congress (APC). However, both lawyers insist that the situation is largely driven by internal disputes and legal strategy within the party.
Effiong criticised the legal approach adopted by a faction reportedly aligned with David Mark, describing it as procedurally flawed. He explained that the Federal High Court did not issue any restraining order but merely directed that all parties be put on notice—an indication that the matter should have been contested at the trial court rather than escalated through an interlocutory appeal.
Opeyemi, on his part, traced the origin of the dispute to a leadership contest following a party meeting in July 2025. He noted that the matter escalated to the Court of Appeal, which in March 2026 ordered all parties to maintain the status quo ante bellum—preserving the situation as it was before the case was filed.
According to him, this directive is binding on all parties, including the electoral commission, which has declined to recognise any faction of the party pending final judgment. He stressed that any action contrary to the court order could amount to a violation of due process.
Both lawyers concluded that the crisis remains an internal legal matter and is likely to persist until the Federal High Court delivers a final ruling on the case.