The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has re-arraigned former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the defunct Skye Bank Plc, Tunde Ayeni, before the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court in Apo, Abuja, over an alleged N15.6 billion fraud.
Ayeni was brought before Justice Jude Onwuegbuzie on Thursday on an amended 18-count charge bordering on criminal breach of trust, misappropriation, and diversion of depositors’ funds.
The latest arraignment marks the third time the former bank chairman has taken his plea in the case. He was first arraigned on May 4, 2026, and re-arraigned on June 22, 2026, before Thursday’s fresh plea following further amendments to the charge.
He pleaded not guilty to all 18 counts.
According to the EFCC, Ayeni allegedly diverted billions of naira belonging to depositors while serving as Chairman of the defunct Skye Bank Plc, now Polaris Bank Limited.
One of the charges alleges that on November 20, 2014, Ayeni dishonestly misappropriated N3.113 billion from the bank’s suspense account by directing that the funds be transferred to the account of Misa Limited domiciled with Zenith Bank. The anti-graft agency contends that the transaction constituted a criminal breach of trust and violated his contractual obligations to the bank.
Another count accuses him of allegedly diverting N5.078 billion from the same suspense account on December 2, 2014, through a transfer to the account of Greenwich Registrars domiciled with Union Bank.
The EFCC maintains that the alleged transactions formed part of the N15.6 billion said to have been unlawfully diverted, contrary to Sections 311 and 312 of the Penal Code.
Following Ayeni’s plea, EFCC prosecuting counsel, Abba Muhammed, SAN, informed the court that the prosecution was prepared to open its case immediately and that its first witness was already present in court.
However, defence counsel, Olalekan Ojo, SAN, opposed the commencement of trial, arguing that the prosecution had not provided the defence with the summary of the witness’s statement as required.
Responding, the prosecution told the court that the summary of the witness’s statement had already been filed together with the second amended charge.
In his ruling, Justice Onwuegbuzie held that the prosecution had complied with the necessary legal requirements and dismissed the defence’s objection.
The judge subsequently adjourned the matter to July 20, 22, and 23, 2026, for the continuation of trial.