Connect with us

International

Education: Afghan Universities Deserted As Taliban Impose New Rules

Published

on

Classroom conditions at Avicenna University in Kabul, Afghanistan
Share

As curtain divides male, female students

classroom conditions at Avicenna University in Kabul, Afghanistan

classroom conditions at Avicenna University in Kabul, Afghanistan

Universities in Kabul were almost empty on the first day of the Afghan school year, as professors and students wrestled with the Taliban’s restrictive new rules for the classroom.

The Taliban have promised a softer rule than during their first stint in power from 1996-2001, when women’s freedoms in Afghanistan were sharply curtailed and they were banned from higher education.

This time, the hardline Islamist group have said women will be allowed to go to private universities under the new regime, but they face tough restrictions on their clothing and movement.

Women can only attend class if they wear an abaya — a flowing robe — and a niqab — a face veil with a small window to see through — and are separated from men, the Taliban said.

“Our students don’t accept this and we will have to close the university,” said Noor Ali Rahmani, the director of Gharjistan University in Kabul, on an almost empty campus on Monday.

“Our students wear the hijab, not the niqab,” he added, referring to a headscarf.

The Taliban education authority issued a lengthy document on Sunday outlining their measures for the classroom, which also ruled that men and women should be segregated — or at least divided by a curtain if there are 15 students or less.

“We said we didn’t accept it because it will be difficult to do,” Rahmani told AFP.

“We also said that it is not real Islam, it is not what the Koran says.”

From now on at private colleges and universities, which have mushroomed since the Taliban’s first rule ended, women must only be taught by other women, or “old men”, and use a women-only entrance.

They must also end their lessons five minutes earlier than men to stop them from mingling outside.

So far, the Taliban has said nothing about public universities.

– ‘Let’s engage’ –

For some students, however, it was a relief that women would still be able to attend university at all under a new Taliban regime.

Zuhra Bahman, who runs a scholarship programme for women in Afghanistan, said on social media she had spoken to some of the students.

“They are happy to go back to university, albeit in hijab,” she said.

“Taliban opening universities for women is a key progress. Let’s continue to engage to agree on other rights and freedoms.”

Jalil Tadjlil, a spokesman for Ibn-e Sina University in the capital, said separate entrances had already been created for men and women.

“We didn’t have the authority to accept or reject the decisions that have been imposed,” he told AFP, blaming the “ongoing uncertainty” for the lack of students.

The university posted a picture online of male and female students separated by a curtain.

Images shared on Facebook by its department of economics and management showed six women wearing the hijab and ten male students with a grey curtain running between them, as a male teacher wrote on a whiteboard.

– ‘Everything changed’ –

Usually, campus corridors on the first day of the term would be packed with students catching up after the summer.

But on Monday, there was a strikingly low turnout at Kabul’s universities, leaving education leaders wondering just how many young, talented people have fled the country as part of the “brain drain”.

Rahmani said only 10 to 20 percent of the 1,000 students who enrolled last year came to Gharjistan University on Monday, although there were no classes scheduled.

He estimated up to 30 percent of the students left Afghanistan after the Taliban seized control in the middle of August.

“We have to see first if students come,” he said.

Reza Ramazan, a computer science teacher at the university said women students were particularly at risk when travelling to campus.

“It can be dangerous at checkpoints,” he said. “The Taliban can check their phones and computers.”

For 28-year-old computer science student Amir Hussein, “everything changed completely” after the Taliban takeover.

“Many students are not interested anymore in studying because they don’t know what their future will be,” he said.

“Most of them want to leave Afghanistan.”

AFP

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

International

US-Iran Tensions Push Global Oil Prices to One-Month High

Published

on

Iran and US Flags
Share

 

Global oil prices climbed sharply on Tuesday, reaching their highest level in one month, as renewed military tensions between the United States and Iran raised fresh concerns over the security of oil supplies through the Strait of Hormuz.

Brent crude, the international benchmark for oil prices, rose by 4.19 percent to $86.79 per barrel, its highest level since June 12. Meanwhile, the US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude gained 3.16 percent to $80.61 per barrel.

The increase follows reports that the United States reimposed a naval blockade on Iran, while renewed exchanges between Washington and Tehran heightened fears of possible disruptions to global energy supplies.

On July 12, Iran announced it had closed the Strait of Hormuz after its naval forces fired a cruise missile at a vessel it alleged was sailing through an unauthorized route. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most important oil shipping routes, with a significant share of global crude exports passing through it daily.

The latest development marks a sharp reversal from just one month ago, when crude oil prices fell to around $82 per barrel after the United States, Israel and Iran reached an agreement to end hostilities across the Middle East, including Lebanon, and reopen the vital waterway.

In Nigeria, the earlier decline in global crude oil prices sparked concerns over domestic fuel pricing.

The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) had accused petroleum marketers of failing to fully pass the benefits of lower international oil prices to consumers, arguing that reductions in pump prices were not proportional to the decline in crude oil prices.

Similarly, Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele, disclosed that the Federal Government was engaging oil marketers and regulators to ensure that changes in global crude oil prices are more transparently reflected in the prices Nigerians pay for petrol.

On July 10, the Federal Government also convened a meeting with key stakeholders in the oil and gas sector to discuss fair and transparent pricing of petroleum products across the country.

With fresh geopolitical tensions threatening global oil supplies, analysts say international crude prices could remain volatile in the coming days, with possible implications for fuel prices worldwide, including in Nigeria.

Continue Reading

International

Ghana Defers Planned Ramaphosa Visit Over Anti-Migrant Tensions in South Africa, Says Diplomatic Ties Remain Strong

Published

on

Share

The Government of Ghana has postponed a planned visit by South African President Cyril Ramaphosa following recent anti-migrant attacks in South Africa, insisting that the decision is aimed at preventing the current tensions from overshadowing bilateral engagements between the two countries.

The development comes after reports of violence and intimidation targeting undocumented migrants in parts of South Africa, with some Ghanaian nationals among the Africans reportedly affected. The incidents sparked diplomatic concern in Accra, prompting Ghana’s Minister for Foreign Affairs, Samuel Ablakwa, to summon South Africa’s Acting High Commissioner, Thando Dalamba, to formally convey the country’s strong displeasure over the reported harassment and intimidation of foreign nationals.

In response to the deteriorating security situation, the Ghanaian government also commenced the repatriation of some of its citizens from South Africa.

Media reports on Tuesday suggested that Ghana had rejected a proposed state visit by President Ramaphosa as a diplomatic response to the attacks, fuelling speculation of a freeze in relations between the two African nations.

However, Ghana’s Minister for Government Communications, Felix Ofosu, dismissed those claims, clarifying that the visit had not been rejected but mutually deferred because of the prevailing circumstances.

According to Ofosu, the visit had been scheduled long before the recent wave of xenophobic attacks and was originally planned for early August 2026.

He explained that the Ghanaian government formally communicated its position to Pretoria, expressing the view that postponing the visit would allow both countries to engage more productively once tensions had eased.

“Let me indicate that this is a visit that had been planned well in advance of the outbreak of the recent xenophobic attacks. Indeed, it was slated to take place in early August 2026, but given the outbreak of these attacks and all the issues that have arisen therefrom, we sent a diplomatic communication to the South African government that we believe it is best to defer the visit until such a time when these matters have been resolved, and there is relative calm,” Ofosu said during an interview with Joy FM.

He added that the recent attacks were likely to dominate discussions during any high-level meeting, thereby distracting from the broader strategic issues both countries intended to address.

“Given the nature of the recent attacks, there is a likelihood that they will overshadow the very important issues that would have to be discussed during such a visit. So we believe that when matters settle, and the issue of xenophobic attacks no longer hangs over such discussions, it will then be appropriate to have the visit,” he stated.

Meanwhile, South Africa has also clarified its position on the planned engagement.

Presidential spokesperson Vincent Magwenya dismissed reports suggesting that President Ramaphosa had requested a state visit to Ghana. He explained that Pretoria had only sought confirmation from the Ghanaian authorities regarding arrangements for the third session of the Ghana–South Africa Bi-National Commission, a bilateral platform expected to be co-chaired by Presidents Ramaphosa and John Mahama.

Despite the postponement, Ghana has reiterated that its relationship with South Africa remains cordial and that the decision should not be interpreted as a deterioration in diplomatic relations.

The latest development reflects the sensitivity surrounding the recent anti-migrant violence in South Africa, which has drawn concern from several African governments and renewed calls for stronger protection of foreign nationals living and working in the country.

 

Continue Reading

International

Ghana Repatriates Citizens From South Africa Amid Rising Anti-Foreigner Violence

Published

on

Ghana
Share

 

The government of Ghana has commenced the repatriation of its citizens from South Africa following weeks of anti-foreigner protests and xenophobic attacks that targeted African migrants living in the country.

The first evacuation flight carrying nearly 300 Ghanaians departed Johannesburg early Wednesday and is expected to arrive in Ghana later in the day. Ghanaian authorities disclosed that about 800 nationals had registered for voluntary repatriation after tensions escalated in several South African communities.

The repatriation exercise follows a wave of hostility against foreign nationals, particularly African immigrants, after videos circulated widely on social media showing confrontations and assaults involving migrants. The incidents reignited fears of xenophobic violence in South Africa, a country that has witnessed recurring anti-immigrant unrest over the years.

Stephen van Neel, head of Immigration and Law Enforcement at South Africa’s Department of Home Affairs, said investigations conducted during the evacuation process revealed that only 10 of the nearly 300 departing Ghanaians possessed valid residency status in the country.

According to him, the majority were found to be undocumented migrants, permit overstayers, or individuals who failed to comply with immigration regulations. He added that South African authorities would enforce appropriate immigration sanctions against affected persons.

Witnesses at Johannesburg’s OR Tambo International Airport reported that men, women, and children arrived in buses before dawn to board the evacuation flight. However, some individuals were unable to travel after encountering documentation-related complications. Officials said those affected could be considered for a second evacuation flight expected later this week.

The anti-foreigner protests reportedly intensified last month after viral videos showed South Africans openly confronting African migrants and questioning their presence in the country. In one widely shared clip, a Ghanaian man was confronted by a group demanding to know why he had relocated to South Africa. Another video showed a man believed to be Ghanaian being physically assaulted.

The developments prompted strong diplomatic reactions from Ghanaian authorities. Ghana’s Foreign Affairs Minister, Samuel Ablakwa, summoned South Africa’s Acting High Commissioner to Ghana, Thando Dalamba, to formally express what he described as Ghana’s “strong concern” over the intimidation and harassment of foreign nationals.

Addressing the evacuees before departure on Wednesday, Ablakwa assured them that adequate arrangements had been made for their reintegration upon arrival in Ghana. He announced a five-point support package prepared by the government to assist returning citizens.

“You are not refugees, you are not some destitute. Ghana is not some war zone where we cannot take care of our own,” the minister told the returnees.

He stated that the evacuation operation demonstrates Ghana’s commitment to safeguarding its citizens abroad and responding swiftly during emergencies affecting nationals overseas.

Nigerians were also among those affected by the renewed xenophobic tensions in South Africa. According to the Nigerian Consulate in Johannesburg, at least two Nigerians were killed during the attacks.

Earlier this month, Nigeria’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, disclosed that President Bola Tinubu had directed relevant authorities to arrange evacuation flights for Nigerians willing to return home voluntarily.

Frank Onyekwelu, president of the Nigerian community in South Africa, said more than 130 Nigerians had already registered for repatriation. However, details regarding the proposed evacuation flights have yet to be officially announced.

Nigeria’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said on Wednesday that further updates concerning the evacuation arrangements would be made public next week.

The latest developments have once again drawn international attention to the recurring issue of xenophobia in South Africa, where frustrations linked to unemployment, crime, and economic hardship are often directed at foreign nationals, particularly migrants from other African countries.

Continue Reading