Connect with us

International

Education: Afghan Universities Deserted As Taliban Impose New Rules

Published

on

Classroom conditions at Avicenna University in Kabul, Afghanistan
Share

As curtain divides male, female students

classroom conditions at Avicenna University in Kabul, Afghanistan

classroom conditions at Avicenna University in Kabul, Afghanistan

Universities in Kabul were almost empty on the first day of the Afghan school year, as professors and students wrestled with the Taliban’s restrictive new rules for the classroom.

The Taliban have promised a softer rule than during their first stint in power from 1996-2001, when women’s freedoms in Afghanistan were sharply curtailed and they were banned from higher education.

This time, the hardline Islamist group have said women will be allowed to go to private universities under the new regime, but they face tough restrictions on their clothing and movement.

Women can only attend class if they wear an abaya — a flowing robe — and a niqab — a face veil with a small window to see through — and are separated from men, the Taliban said.

“Our students don’t accept this and we will have to close the university,” said Noor Ali Rahmani, the director of Gharjistan University in Kabul, on an almost empty campus on Monday.

“Our students wear the hijab, not the niqab,” he added, referring to a headscarf.

The Taliban education authority issued a lengthy document on Sunday outlining their measures for the classroom, which also ruled that men and women should be segregated — or at least divided by a curtain if there are 15 students or less.

“We said we didn’t accept it because it will be difficult to do,” Rahmani told AFP.

“We also said that it is not real Islam, it is not what the Koran says.”

From now on at private colleges and universities, which have mushroomed since the Taliban’s first rule ended, women must only be taught by other women, or “old men”, and use a women-only entrance.

They must also end their lessons five minutes earlier than men to stop them from mingling outside.

So far, the Taliban has said nothing about public universities.

– ‘Let’s engage’ –

For some students, however, it was a relief that women would still be able to attend university at all under a new Taliban regime.

Zuhra Bahman, who runs a scholarship programme for women in Afghanistan, said on social media she had spoken to some of the students.

“They are happy to go back to university, albeit in hijab,” she said.

“Taliban opening universities for women is a key progress. Let’s continue to engage to agree on other rights and freedoms.”

Jalil Tadjlil, a spokesman for Ibn-e Sina University in the capital, said separate entrances had already been created for men and women.

“We didn’t have the authority to accept or reject the decisions that have been imposed,” he told AFP, blaming the “ongoing uncertainty” for the lack of students.

The university posted a picture online of male and female students separated by a curtain.

Images shared on Facebook by its department of economics and management showed six women wearing the hijab and ten male students with a grey curtain running between them, as a male teacher wrote on a whiteboard.

– ‘Everything changed’ –

Usually, campus corridors on the first day of the term would be packed with students catching up after the summer.

But on Monday, there was a strikingly low turnout at Kabul’s universities, leaving education leaders wondering just how many young, talented people have fled the country as part of the “brain drain”.

Rahmani said only 10 to 20 percent of the 1,000 students who enrolled last year came to Gharjistan University on Monday, although there were no classes scheduled.

He estimated up to 30 percent of the students left Afghanistan after the Taliban seized control in the middle of August.

“We have to see first if students come,” he said.

Reza Ramazan, a computer science teacher at the university said women students were particularly at risk when travelling to campus.

“It can be dangerous at checkpoints,” he said. “The Taliban can check their phones and computers.”

For 28-year-old computer science student Amir Hussein, “everything changed completely” after the Taliban takeover.

“Many students are not interested anymore in studying because they don’t know what their future will be,” he said.

“Most of them want to leave Afghanistan.”

AFP

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

International

Nigeria, Benin Deepen Defence Cooperation to Combat Cross-Border Security Threats

Published

on

General Musa addressing troops Musa inspects Nigerian Army troops deployed in Togbin, Cotonou, on the Peace Support Mission in the Republic of Benin under Operation ATILEYIN ALAFIA II (Photo by Office of Honourable Minister of Defence)
Share

 

Nigeria and the Republic of Benin have agreed to strengthen their bilateral defence cooperation and deepen joint efforts to tackle cross-border security threats, terrorism, piracy and other forms of transnational crime across West Africa.

The agreement followed a three-day working visit to Cotonou by Nigeria’s Minister of Defence, General Christopher Musa (Rtd.), at the invitation of his Beninese counterpart, Gildas Agonkan.

During the high-level engagements, both countries discussed measures to harmonise regional security frameworks, enhance intelligence sharing and reinforce military collaboration to safeguard democratic governance, secure shared land borders and strengthen security in the Gulf of Guinea against piracy and maritime crime.

A major outcome of the discussions was the decision to establish seamless, real-time intelligence fusion mechanisms that will enable the armed forces of both countries to track, monitor and neutralise transnational criminal networks and insurgent groups before they carry out attacks.

General Musa reaffirmed Nigeria’s commitment to a zero-tolerance policy against terrorism, stressing the need for closer military cooperation to deny violent extremist groups safe havens within the shared border communities. Nigeria also offered Benin an expanded pursuit range for security personnel operating along the borders to help prevent insurgent infiltration, illegal trafficking and other cross-border crimes.

As part of the visit, the Defence Minister inspected Nigerian Army troops deployed in Togbin, Cotonou, under Operation ATILEYIN ALAFIA II, a Peace Support Mission in the Republic of Benin.

Addressing the troops, General Musa commended their dedication and assured them of the Federal Government’s continued support.

“We are going to partner with the troops of the Republic of Benin to ensure that we stop all those bandits and criminals that are killing people in our countries, so that we can deal with them,” he said.

He explained that one of the key objectives of his visit was to engage with Benin’s Defence Minister to develop coordinated operational strategies aimed at preventing criminal elements from exploiting the porous borders between both countries.

General Musa also conveyed President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s commitment to improving the welfare of members of the Armed Forces. He assured the troops that the Federal Government was taking concrete steps to provide better welfare packages, equipment and other necessary support to enable them to effectively carry out their duties.

The Nigerian delegation also visited the Centre for Post-Conflict Demining and Explosive Ordnance Disposal Operations, as well as the Glo-Djigbe Industrial Zone. The visits were aimed at promoting local capacity building and supporting the Defence Ministry’s Intelligence-Driven and Technology-Enabled Defence strategy.

Both countries also exchanged ideas on strengthening industrial development, economic cooperation and regional integration in line with the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) protocols and the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA).

General Musa further held diplomatic consultations with Nigeria’s Ambassador to the Republic of Benin, Mrs. Mopelola Ibrahim, where he reaffirmed President Tinubu’s commitment to military welfare, regional peace and enhanced security cooperation among neighbouring countries.

The Defence Minister has since concluded his official visit and returned to Abuja after reaffirming Nigeria’s commitment to closer defence collaboration with the Republic of Benin in addressing emerging security challenges across the West African sub-region.

 

Continue Reading

International

US-Iran Tensions Push Global Oil Prices to One-Month High

Published

on

Iran and US Flags
Share

 

Global oil prices climbed sharply on Tuesday, reaching their highest level in one month, as renewed military tensions between the United States and Iran raised fresh concerns over the security of oil supplies through the Strait of Hormuz.

Brent crude, the international benchmark for oil prices, rose by 4.19 percent to $86.79 per barrel, its highest level since June 12. Meanwhile, the US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude gained 3.16 percent to $80.61 per barrel.

The increase follows reports that the United States reimposed a naval blockade on Iran, while renewed exchanges between Washington and Tehran heightened fears of possible disruptions to global energy supplies.

On July 12, Iran announced it had closed the Strait of Hormuz after its naval forces fired a cruise missile at a vessel it alleged was sailing through an unauthorized route. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most important oil shipping routes, with a significant share of global crude exports passing through it daily.

The latest development marks a sharp reversal from just one month ago, when crude oil prices fell to around $82 per barrel after the United States, Israel and Iran reached an agreement to end hostilities across the Middle East, including Lebanon, and reopen the vital waterway.

In Nigeria, the earlier decline in global crude oil prices sparked concerns over domestic fuel pricing.

The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) had accused petroleum marketers of failing to fully pass the benefits of lower international oil prices to consumers, arguing that reductions in pump prices were not proportional to the decline in crude oil prices.

Similarly, Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele, disclosed that the Federal Government was engaging oil marketers and regulators to ensure that changes in global crude oil prices are more transparently reflected in the prices Nigerians pay for petrol.

On July 10, the Federal Government also convened a meeting with key stakeholders in the oil and gas sector to discuss fair and transparent pricing of petroleum products across the country.

With fresh geopolitical tensions threatening global oil supplies, analysts say international crude prices could remain volatile in the coming days, with possible implications for fuel prices worldwide, including in Nigeria.

Continue Reading

International

Ghana Defers Planned Ramaphosa Visit Over Anti-Migrant Tensions in South Africa, Says Diplomatic Ties Remain Strong

Published

on

Share

The Government of Ghana has postponed a planned visit by South African President Cyril Ramaphosa following recent anti-migrant attacks in South Africa, insisting that the decision is aimed at preventing the current tensions from overshadowing bilateral engagements between the two countries.

The development comes after reports of violence and intimidation targeting undocumented migrants in parts of South Africa, with some Ghanaian nationals among the Africans reportedly affected. The incidents sparked diplomatic concern in Accra, prompting Ghana’s Minister for Foreign Affairs, Samuel Ablakwa, to summon South Africa’s Acting High Commissioner, Thando Dalamba, to formally convey the country’s strong displeasure over the reported harassment and intimidation of foreign nationals.

In response to the deteriorating security situation, the Ghanaian government also commenced the repatriation of some of its citizens from South Africa.

Media reports on Tuesday suggested that Ghana had rejected a proposed state visit by President Ramaphosa as a diplomatic response to the attacks, fuelling speculation of a freeze in relations between the two African nations.

However, Ghana’s Minister for Government Communications, Felix Ofosu, dismissed those claims, clarifying that the visit had not been rejected but mutually deferred because of the prevailing circumstances.

According to Ofosu, the visit had been scheduled long before the recent wave of xenophobic attacks and was originally planned for early August 2026.

He explained that the Ghanaian government formally communicated its position to Pretoria, expressing the view that postponing the visit would allow both countries to engage more productively once tensions had eased.

“Let me indicate that this is a visit that had been planned well in advance of the outbreak of the recent xenophobic attacks. Indeed, it was slated to take place in early August 2026, but given the outbreak of these attacks and all the issues that have arisen therefrom, we sent a diplomatic communication to the South African government that we believe it is best to defer the visit until such a time when these matters have been resolved, and there is relative calm,” Ofosu said during an interview with Joy FM.

He added that the recent attacks were likely to dominate discussions during any high-level meeting, thereby distracting from the broader strategic issues both countries intended to address.

“Given the nature of the recent attacks, there is a likelihood that they will overshadow the very important issues that would have to be discussed during such a visit. So we believe that when matters settle, and the issue of xenophobic attacks no longer hangs over such discussions, it will then be appropriate to have the visit,” he stated.

Meanwhile, South Africa has also clarified its position on the planned engagement.

Presidential spokesperson Vincent Magwenya dismissed reports suggesting that President Ramaphosa had requested a state visit to Ghana. He explained that Pretoria had only sought confirmation from the Ghanaian authorities regarding arrangements for the third session of the Ghana–South Africa Bi-National Commission, a bilateral platform expected to be co-chaired by Presidents Ramaphosa and John Mahama.

Despite the postponement, Ghana has reiterated that its relationship with South Africa remains cordial and that the decision should not be interpreted as a deterioration in diplomatic relations.

The latest development reflects the sensitivity surrounding the recent anti-migrant violence in South Africa, which has drawn concern from several African governments and renewed calls for stronger protection of foreign nationals living and working in the country.

 

Continue Reading