Connect with us

Judiciary

Nnamdi Kanu’s trial adjourned till 2022

Published

on

Nnamdi-Kanu
Nnamdi Kanu
Share

Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Wednesday adjourned the trial of the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra to January 19, 2022.

Kanu has been detained in the Department of State Services (DSS) facility since he was arrested in Kenya and brought back into the country.

The legal team of Nnamdi Kanu had on Tuesday staged a walk out over refusal of secret police to allow them access into the Court room to observe proceedings.

Kanu, who was brought into the courtroom around 9:52am, had shortly after his case was called up, bemoaned the refusal of security agents to allow some members of his legal team, especially his lawyer from the the United States of America, Bruce Fein, to enter the courtroom.

The IPOB leader told the court that Mr.Fein, who he said was handling a case for him in the US, was around to witness his trial.

“I have an ongoing case in the US. I have not been allowed to see him.He is here to see me and to observe the proceedings.

“He has been to the DSS to see me, but they denied him access to me”, Kanu stated from the dock.

The prosecuting Counsel and Director of Public Prosecution, M.D Abubakar told the Court to proceed with the trial in the absence of Kanu’s lawyers.

Abubakar told the court that ordinarily, the matter was fixed for hearing of an application that was filed by the Defendant.

He argued that since Kanu’s lead counsel, Mr. Ifeanyi Ejiofor, who was initially inside the courtroom, walked out with his team shortly before the arrival of the judge, his pending application should be deemed abandoned.

In a short ruling, though Justice Nyako expressed his displeasure over the conduct of Kanu’s lawyers, she declined to dismiss the pending application and rather adjourned the case till January 19 and 20, 2022, for trial.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Judiciary

Alleged Assault: CCT Chairman, Danladi Umar Fails In Bid To Stop Senate Probe

Published

on

Chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal, Danladi Umar
Share

 

A Federal High Court in Abuja says the Nigerian Senate has the power to investigate Chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal, Danladi Umar over the case of an alleged assault on a security guard at a shopping mall in Abuja.

Delivering Judgement on Tuesday, Justice Inyang Ekwo, said the CCT boss failed to display high moral public standards by his conduct and with the Code of Conduct Bureau being a product of an Act ratified by the National Assembly, it, therefore, has powers to investigate his conduct.

The court subsequently dismissed the suit by Mr Umar seeking to stop his investigation by the Senate Committee Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions, for lacking in merit.

The CCT Chairman had challenged among other things, the powers of the Senate to investigate him in an alleged assault perpetrated against a security guard at Banex Plaza in Abuja.

He is also asking the court for an order of perpetual injunction restraining the Senate, its members, and agents from conducting or continuing to conduct investigations into the allegations of assault leveled against him via a petition submitted to the Senate.

Specifically, the plaintiff wants the court to determine whether the alleged case of assault which took place at Banex plaza in Abuja on March 29, 2021, formed part of the matters the Senate is constitutionally empowered to investigate, as it’s not subject to the provision of section 88 and 89 of the 1999 constitution.

The victim, Clement Sargwak, had alleged that he was assaulted by the CCT Chairman and a policeman attached to him in March 2021 at the popular Banex plaza Abuja where he worked as a security guard.

According to Sargwak, the CCT boss assaulted him while undergoing his lawful activities after he informed him that his car was wrongly parked.

The victim, therefore, asked the Senate to ensure justice is done over his case.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Court dissolves marriage over sexual denial by wife

Published

on

Symbol of Justice
Share

 

An Igando Customary Court on Tuesday dissolved the union between Mr Taofeek Muritala and Mrs Jelilat Muritala on grounds of frequent fighting and lack of love.

The petitioner, Mr Muritala, a resident of No.11, Muritala Taofeek St.,  White Sand area of Isheri in Lagos State, had approached the court on Dec. 2, 2021 seeking  the dissolution of his 10-year-old marriage to his wife.

He alleged  that  his wife was very troublesome, being too heady and not taking care of their children.

“Our problem started in 2002 when I was a motorcycle operator and my wife just delivered a baby.

Then, I used to give her N100 as daily allowance, but for some time I could not meet up because I had to also deliver money to the owner of the motorcycle I was riding.

” One day, she calculated all the money I owed her  which  she said amounted to N900.  On that day,  she held on to my shirt, fought me and insisted that I must give her the money or  else that  I would not leave the house.

“It was the neighbours that had to intervene and in the process, she tore my cloths.

“She would always leave the house and only to return later  whenever she felt like.

Also,  she dislikes my mother, alleging that my mother used to complain that the pieces of  meat she put in the pot of soup were always  too big among other flimsy reasons.

“Each time my mother was  visiting us,  my wife would fight her. Because of the incessant quarrels between them,  I had to advise my mother not to visit again.

” Also,  I’m  the one who is always taking  our children to school.  She does not have the time to take care of them; she does only what pleases her, she’s such a hooligan.

“Anytime there was a fight between us, she would not  hesitate to draw out a knife or break bottles,” he said.

The petitioner also told the court that his wife would  not take to corrections and was fond of  disrespecting  his family, hence, there is  no more love between them.

He then urged the court to grant him a divorce from his wife.

The respondent, Mrs  Jelilat  Muritala, a caterer and a resident of the same address as her husband, countered all that her husband said, but told the court that they used to  quarrel  because of sex.

“Our fight is simply because of sex, he demands sex everyday and I’m tired of it.

Also, it is not true that I don’t take care of the children, I always do. He only takes them to school since he operates a motorcycle.

“I do not also fight my mother-in-law, but there is nothing I do that pleases her. She complains about everything I do, but I have a cordial relationship with other  members of my husband’s  family.

“He said that  I used charm on him; that  is also a lie. When he was very sick, I took him to a  church where he was given blessed water which cured his illness, so how does that translate to charm?

“Although,  he claimed that it was not the water that healed him that it was the charcoal he took,” she said.

The respondent told the court that truly there was no more  love between them since her husband had married a second wife.

She added that she had moved on with her life.

The  President of the court, Mr Koledoye Adeniyi, in his judgment said that after listening to both  sides, the respondent was not submissive enough and to make matters worse, they  dragged their  children into their rift.

He said that it was wrong for the wife to have denied her husband sex even though he was demanding it daily, adding that it was part of what contributed to the failure of the marriage.

According to the  president, the woman’s  act of denying her husband sex was what pushed him into marrying another woman to satisfy his sexual urge.

“In this view,  the marriage has broken down irretrievably and therefore the dissolution of their marriage succeeds ,” he said.

He ordered the petitioner to give the respondent the sum of N200,000 as severance allowance and to also pay the sum of N150,000 to assist the respondent to secure an accommodation where should would relocate to.

He also ordered the petitioner to take good care of the younger children in his care and be responsible for the education of the grown up children.

He said that any violation of the judgment would  be regarded as contempt  of the court and  would attract six months’ imprisonment without an option of fine.

 

(NAN)

 

Continue Reading

Judiciary

5 car dealers docked for allegedly violating EFCC regulations

Published

on

EFCC
EFCC Chairman Abdulrasheed Bawa and Logo
Share

A Federal High Court sitting in Sokoto has adjourned hearing in the case of five car dealers standing trial for allegedly violating Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) regulations.

The defendants are: Shehu Ahmad, Shehu Mariga, Aliyu Dauda, Tukur Shehu and Umaru Yabo.

The defendants were arraigned along with their companies, Ijabah Motors, Jangwarzo General Motors, KGN Gumbi Motors, Daraja Motors 2 and Gamji Motors.

They were accused of allegedly failing to submit declaration of activities, in line with extant regulations on customer identification and rendition of returns on transactions to the Special Control Unit against Money Laundering (SCUML).

The defendants had pleaded guilty when case was first mentioned on March 17.

The parties were, however, asked to prove and defend their case, in the interest of justice.

At Thursday’s sitting, the Prosecution Counsel, Mr Sa’ad Hannafi, led a witness, Ahmad Bello, an EFCC official who testified on non-compliance by the defendants and tendered exhibits, which were admitted by the court.

The trial judge, Justice James Omotosho, adjourned the case till May 11 for prosecution and defence counsel to adopt their written addresses.

Omotosho ordered the defendants to continue with the bail earlier admitted by the court.

 

 

NAN

Continue Reading