Connect with us

Judiciary

Wiretapping Allegation: Court Orders El-Rufai to Enter Defence

Published

on

Former Kaduna State Governor,Nasir El -Rufai
Share

 

The Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed a no-case submission by former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, and ordered him to enter his defence, if he so wishes, in his ongoing trial over the alleged unlawful interception of telephone communications belonging to National Security Adviser (NSA), Nuhu Ribadu.

Justice Joyce Abdulmalik gave the order on Monday while ruling on El-Rufai’s no-case submission, holding that the prosecution had presented sufficient evidence to warrant calling on the defendant to respond to the allegations.

The dismissal of the no-case submission means the court has found sufficient grounds for El-Rufai to be called upon to present his defence, although it does not amount to a determination of his guilt.

The judge subsequently adjourned the case until November 25 for the defence proceedings.

El-Rufai is standing trial over allegations of unlawfully intercepting Ribadu’s telephone communications, charges he is entitled to defend himself against as the case proceeds.

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Judiciary

Imo Court Targets January 2027 for Trial of Five Suspected Kidnappers

Published

on

Kidnap Suspects
Share

 

An Imo State High Court sitting in Owerri has called for an accelerated hearing of cases involving five suspected kidnappers, directing prosecution and defence counsel to cooperate with the court to ensure judgments are delivered before January 2027.

The presiding judge, Justice Emeka Orafu, made the appeal during proceedings involving three defendants accused of abducting prospective members of the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) and two others facing charges in a separate kidnapping case.

At the hearing, a Department of State Services (DSS) investigative officer, Ikem Emmanuel, testified on the investigation that led to the arrest of the three defendants in the NYSC-related case.

Emmanuel told the court that the investigation involved intelligence gathering, phone data analysis, record checks, interviews and statements obtained from the defendants, victims and witnesses.

He further disclosed that an identification parade was conducted, during which victims and witnesses allegedly identified the defendants as members of the criminal gang.

The DSS officer also told the court that one of the defendants, Usman Aliyu, admitted in his statement to participating in the operation and allegedly revealed that 11 persons were involved.

According to the witness, the defendants’ statements were obtained in the presence of their legal representatives and DSS legal officers.

In a separate proceeding involving two other defendants, Emmanuel also testified on the investigation, stating that their statements were equally taken in the presence of their lawyers and DSS legal officers.

Following the proceedings, Justice Orafu adjourned the cases to October 27, 28, 29 and 30 for continuation of hearings.

The judge reiterated the need for all counsel to work closely with the court to ensure the cases are determined expeditiously, with judgments delivered before January 2027.

The five defendants are to remain in DSS custody pending the continuation of proceedings.

The cases followed the abduction of 20 prospective corps members by gunmen on October 1, 2026, near Umunoha in Mbaitoli Local Government Area of Imo State.

The victims were reportedly travelling from Ibadan, Oyo State, to their assigned NYSC orientation camps in Abia and Akwa Ibom states when they were abducted.

They and a civilian were rescued six days later from the Amakohia-Ubi forest in Owerri West Local Government Area.

The DSS subsequently arrested five suspects in intelligence-led operations conducted between October 10 and 14 in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, and Aba, Abia State.

The court proceedings are expected to continue later this month as the prosecution presents its evidence in the cases.

 

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Supreme Court Bans Use of ‘Barrister’ as Title in Official Correspondence

Published

on

Share

The Supreme Court of Nigeria has directed all litigation staff, legal practitioners, court registrars and lawyers attached to the apex court to discontinue the use of the title “Barrister” as a prefix to their names in all official engagements.

The directive was contained in a memorandum dated July 13, 2026, signed by the Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court, Kabir Akanbi.

Addressed to litigation staff, legal practitioners, court registrars and lawyers, the circular said the measure was part of efforts to uphold professional standards within the apex court.

The directive ordered all affected officers to immediately discontinue the use of the title in official correspondence, records, documents, identity materials and other official engagements connected with the Supreme Court.

The Chief Registrar also instructed Heads of Departments and Unit Heads to ensure strict compliance with the directive by all personnel under their supervision.

The memo did not state the reasons behind the policy beyond the need to uphold professional standards within the nation’s highest court.

The Supreme Court’s order comes weeks after the Council of Legal Education warned prospective lawyers against wearing wigs and gowns or presenting themselves as qualified legal practitioners before they are formally called to the Nigerian Bar.

The council said such conduct undermined the dignity of the legal profession and warned that violators could face disciplinary measures. It also reminded candidates that the use of legal regalia is governed by the Rules of Professional Conduct and is reserved for duly qualified legal practitioners.

The development has sparked discussions within legal circles, where the title “Barrister” is commonly used by legal practitioners after being called to the Nigerian Bar.

Legal analysts however say the CJN’s directive reinforces the distinction between qualification and title, and seeks to align courtroom decorum at the Supreme Court with global best practice, where “Barrister” is not used as a formal prefix.

The Supreme Court did not indicate any sanctions for non-compliance, but heads of departments have been tasked with enforcing the new rule.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Gbajabiamila Sues PFIPC’s Adeniyi Adeyemi for N15bn Over Alleged Defamatory Claims

Published

on

Femi Gbajabiamila and Adeniyi Adeyemi
Share

 

The Chief of Staff to President Bola Tinubu, Femi Gbajabiamila, has instituted a N15 billion defamation suit against Adeniyi Adeyemi, Director-General of the controversial Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), over allegations bordering on bribery, murder and abuse of office.

The suit, filed before a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, seeks N10 billion in general damages, N5 billion in aggravated damages, N200 million as the cost of the action, and an order compelling Adeyemi to publish a full retraction and unconditional apology in five national newspapers and across all platforms where the allegations were circulated.

The legal action follows a pre-action notice issued on July 7, in which Gbajabiamila, through his counsel, Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Kemi Pinheiro, demanded that Adeyemi withdraw the allegations and apologise within 72 hours.

The letter also directed Adeyemi to remove all videos and publications in which he accused the Chief of Staff of collecting a N400 million bribe through a proxy in connection with appointments into the PFIPC—an entity the Presidency has publicly disowned as non-existent.

Adeyemi had further alleged that Gbajabiamila orchestrated efforts to deploy security agencies against him and linked the presidential aide to the death of Babatunde Tanimola, whom he described as an intermediary between himself and the Chief of Staff.

In the statement of claim before the court, Gbajabiamila categorically denied the allegations, describing them as “false, baseless, malicious, reckless and entirely devoid of factual or evidential foundation.”

He maintained that he had never met, spoken with, or communicated with Adeyemi in any capacity and had never authorised any individual to act as his representative in soliciting or receiving money on his behalf.

According to the court documents, despite receiving the cease-and-desist letter, Adeyemi failed to retract the allegations. Instead, he reportedly granted an interview to social media personality Martins Vincent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan, during which he admitted that he had never personally met Gbajabiamila and that his alleged dealings were conducted through the late Babatunde Tanimola.

The suit also cited another interview granted by Adeyemi on Channels Television’s Politics Today, aired on July 13 and anchored by Seun Okinbaloye, where he allegedly reiterated the substance of his earlier claims without issuing any retraction.

Gbajabiamila is asking the court to declare that the statements made and published by Adeyemi are false, malicious and defamatory.

In addition to the monetary claims, the Chief of Staff is seeking an order directing Adeyemi to publish a full retraction and unconditional apology in at least five national newspapers within seven days of the court’s judgment.

He is also requesting that the apology remain published across all relevant social media and electronic platforms for 30 consecutive days, alongside an order compelling the removal of every publication, video and recording containing the alleged defamatory statements.

Furthermore, the suit seeks a perpetual injunction restraining Adeyemi, his agents, privies or associates from making or publishing any further defamatory statements against Gbajabiamila, as well as 10 per cent post-judgment interest on the monetary awards until full payment is made.

Continue Reading