Connect with us

Judiciary

Police officer to die by hanging for killing Lagos lawyer

Published

on

Share

The Lagos State High Court sitting at Tafawa Balewa Square has sentenced ASP Drambi Vandi, the police officer who killed a lawyer, Bolanle Raheem, to death by hanging.

The presiding judge, Justice Ibironke Harrison, while delivering judgement on Monday, October 9, 2023, convicted Vandi of a one-count charge of murder.

“The court finds the defendant guilty on one count of murder. You will be hanged by the neck till you are dead,” the judge held.

While delivering judgment, Justice Harrison said that none of the eyewitness actually saw the defendant pull the trigger.

She, however, held that circumstantial evidence was overwhelming to prove that Vandi murdered Raheem.

According to the judge, a defendant can be convicted when circumstantial evidence is overwhelming.

The judge said: “The question in the mind of the court is: Did the prosecution provide any additional evidence?

“The court finds that the ammunition of the other officers who were on patrol with the defendant remained intact but two of the defendant’s ammunition were missing.”

Harrison said that the defendant had alleged that the shortfall in his ammunition was because it was counted in his absence.

The judge also noted that Vandi testified that the bullet tendered in court was not his, saying, however, that Vandi constituted himself as a ballistician pathologist without tendering a certificate to that effect.

She, therefore, dismissed the evidence.

“The court finds that the forensic expert and the medical doctor’s evidence confirm the circumstantial evidence that the defendant had the opportunity to shoot the victim and that the victim was shot and died from the gunshot.

“Every eyewitness heard the loud noise and passers-by shouted in Yoruba Language (oti pa eyan) meaning: you have killed someone,” she said.

Harrison held that the prosecution proved its case beyond every reasonable doubt that it was the convict who shot the gun that killed the deceased.

“The death of the deceased was instantaneous. There is no other explanation, it was the gunshot that shattered the side glass and pierced the victim’s chest.

“It was the defendant who had an AK-47 riffle whose ammunition was missing after the armourer counted it,” she held.

She also held that the defendant did not say that he pointed the gun to force or scare people in the vehicle to obey order and park the vehicle.

She added that the defendant did not say that the shooting was accidental which would have earned him a smaller sentence of manslaughter.

“Therefore, the defendant is found guilty of the one count charge and sentenced to death by hanging until he dies,” she held.

The court had, in July 2023, fixed today to deliver judgement after the adoption of final written addresses by parties in the suit.

Vandi was arraigned on January 16 on a count charge of murder but he pleaded not guilty.

The Lagos State Government alleged that the police officer shot the lawyer in the chest at Ajah Roundabout on the Lekki expressway in Lagos State on December 25, 2022.

It stated that the murder contravenes Section 223 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State, 2015.

A police Inspector, Matthew Ameh, who was a colleague of Vandi, had told the court how the policeman shot the deceased on Christmas Day.

Ameh told the court that on December 25, 2022, he was posted to Ajah Under Bridge with the defendant (Vandi) and another officer, Inspector Dimini.

Ameh, who said he had been working with the police since 2001, stated that he worked at the Lagos State Police Command and was attached to the Ajah Division.

The witness disclosed that the Divisional Police Officer had instructed them to go and protect lives and property, adding that their duty on December 25, at Ajah Under Bridge, was to conduct a stop-and-search operation.

He said: “We were armed while conducting our duty but we were instructed not to use our arms unless someone’s life or our lives were in danger.

“As we were at our duty post, Insp Dimini was in front, I was in the middle while Vandi was behind me.

“There was a Toyota car with no number plate which Inspector Dimini tried to flag down but it didn’t stop. I also flagged it down, it didn’t stop. The next thing I heard was a gunshot.

“I looked back and saw the screen of the car falling down. The next thing: a dark woman jumped down from the vehicle, held the defendant, shouting oga you have killed my sister.”

Judiciary

Court Orders Interim Forfeiture of Properties Linked to Timipre Sylva

Published

on

Timipre Sylva
Timipre Sylva
Share

A Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the interim forfeiture of nine properties allegedly linked to former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Timipre Sylva.

Justice Obiora Egwuatu granted the order following an ex parte application filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

The court held that the properties, believed to be proceeds of unlawful activities, should be temporarily forfeited to the Federal Government pending the determination of a motion for final forfeiture.

Justice Egwuatu also directed the EFCC to publish the interim forfeiture order in at least two national newspapers within seven days of receiving the certified true copy of the ruling. Interested parties were given 14 days to appear before the court and show cause why the properties should not be permanently forfeited.

The case was adjourned until May 25 for a compliance report.

According to the EFCC counsel, Oluwaleke Atolagbe, the commission sought the order on the grounds that the assets were reasonably suspected to have been acquired through unlawful means.

The affected properties are located in Abuja districts including Maitama, Wuse, Garki, Mpape, and Dakibiyu.

The properties include residential apartments, duplexes, terraces, and office complexes, including a structure currently occupied by the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA).

Sylva has also been linked to allegations surrounding a failed coup plot against President Bola Tinubu, although no formal charge has been filed against him in relation to the allegation.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Plateau Govt Arraigns Suspects Over Anguwan Rukuba Killings, Charges Them With Terrorism

Published

on

Plateau State Map
Share

The Plateau State Government has arraigned several suspects allegedly linked to the deadly Anguwan Rukuba attack, a tragic incident that claimed over 30 lives and sparked widespread outrage across the state.

The suspects, who were apprehended by operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS), were brought before the Plateau State High Court in Jos on multiple charges bordering on terrorism and conspiracy.

The arraignment took place before Justice Gidelia Fomyong and Justice Jacob Longden in Courts 12 and 9 respectively, drawing significant public attention as grieving families and concerned residents continue to demand justice.

According to the State Attorney General, Philemon Daffi, who filed the charges, the accused persons allegedly violated provisions of Sections 269 and 270 of the Plateau State Penal Code Law, 2017.

The defendants include Isa Umar Ibrahim and Musa Abubakar Ibrahim from Riyom Local Government Area; Auwalu Abubakar, also known as Auwalu Dogo, from Jos North Local Government Area; and Musa Abubakar Ibrahim, also known as Yaroro, also from Jos North. Another suspect, Ado Ibrahim from Riyom, is currently at large.

In the charge sheet presented before the court, the prosecution alleged that the defendants conspired on March 28, 2025, in Farin Gada, Jos North, to plan, organize, and finance the attack in Anguwan Rukuba.

They were further accused of facilitating and contributing resources that led to the violent assault on the community.

The prosecution maintained that the attack resulted in the deaths of more than 30 people, describing the actions of the suspects as acts of terrorism under the state’s penal laws.

The suspects were reportedly arrested between April 3 and April 10, 2026, following investigations by security operatives.

The Anguwan Rukuba killings had heightened tensions across Jos and surrounding areas, prompting calls from civil society groups and residents for swift justice and improved security measures.

For families who lost loved ones, the court proceedings signal the beginning of a long-awaited quest for justice. Observers note that the outcome of the trial could have far-reaching implications for security and accountability in Plateau State.

The case has been adjourned to a later date for further hearing, as the court begins the process of examining the charges and evidence presented by the prosecution.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

DSS Arraigns Former Kaduna Governor Nasir El-Rufai on Five-Count Charge, Pleads Not Guilty

Published

on

Former Kaduna State Governor,Nasir El -Rufai
Share

The Department of State Services (DSS) has arraigned former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, before the Federal High Court in Abuja over an alleged breach of national security.

El-Rufai was brought before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik and faced a five-count amended charge. When the charges were read to him, he pleaded not guilty to all counts.

At the hearing, counsel to the DSS, Oluwole Aladedoye (SAN), informed the court that the matter was scheduled for the defendant to take his plea. He also revealed that the prosecution had filed a new amended five-count charge on April 13, asking the court to replace the earlier three-count charge.

The defence counsel, Oluwole Iyamu (SAN), confirmed receipt of the amended charge and raised no objection. The court subsequently struck out the initial three-count charge.

Following El-Rufai’s plea, the prosecution requested three consecutive days to begin trial. However, the defence objected, citing logistical challenges. Iyamu told the court that his client was currently in the custody of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), which could make access to him difficult during the proposed trial period.

The defence also drew attention to a bail application filed on February 17. Although a supporting affidavit was initially missing from the court file, the issue was resolved after the matter was briefly stood down. The DSS stated it did not oppose the bail request.

Meanwhile, the prosecution applied for an order to protect the identities of two witnesses expected to testify. It requested that their names be concealed in public records and that pseudonyms be used during proceedings, citing security concerns and the potential risk to the witnesses’ families.

The defence opposed the request, arguing that it is the constitutional right of an accused person to know the identity of their accusers. Iyamu maintained that there was no evidence suggesting that El-Rufai posed any threat or had a following capable of endangering witnesses. He warned that granting anonymity could unfairly prejudice the defendant.

In addition, the defence asked the court to compel the prosecution to provide all relevant evidence needed to prepare for trial. The prosecution opposed this request, arguing that the documents sought were not part of the materials filed before the court.

The defence also informed the court of a separate application to quash the charges. Legal arguments followed, with the prosecution contending that such an application cannot be filed after a plea has already been taken. The defence responded on points of law.

Justice Abdulmalik is expected to rule on the various applications and adjourn the case for further proceedings.

Continue Reading